原创 Mani 北大法宝 2025年09月04日 17:22 北京
北大法宝推出“法宝双语案例”栏目。本栏目选取近期热门司法案例进行双语发布，每两周一期，欢迎关注！感谢新老朋友对北大法宝的大力支持，我们会持续为大家提供更好的法律信息服务。本周推送第一百五十五期，主要关注涉著作权侵权纠纷案例！
本期双语案例推送央视动漫集团有限公司与杭州大头儿子文化发展有限公司著作权侵权纠纷再审案等涉著作权侵权纠纷案例。
目录
Contents
1. 央视动漫集团有限公司与杭州大头儿子文化发展有限公司著作权侵权纠纷再审案CCTV Animation Group Co., Ltd. v. Hangzhou Datou Erzi Cultural Development Co., Ltd. (retrial case regarding dispute over copyright infringement)
2. 中国音像著作权集体管理协会与台儿庄区神话会所KTV娱乐店侵害作品放映权纠纷上诉案China Audio-Video Copyright Association v. Shenhua KTV Entertainment Club, Tai'erzhuang District (appeal case regarding dispute over infringement of projection right)
3. 北京龙威互动科技有限公司与上海可那信息科技有限公司侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷上诉案Beijing Longwei Interactive Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Kena Information Technology Co., Ltd. (appellate case regarding dispute over computer software copyright infringement)
一、央视动漫集团有限公司与杭州大头儿子文化发展有限公司著作权侵权纠纷再审案
CCTV Animation Group Co., Ltd. v. Hangzhou Datou Erzi Cultural Development Co., Ltd. (retrial case regarding dispute over copyright infringement)
【裁判摘要】
当事人受他人委托对卡通动画片中的卡通形象进行创作的，其独立设计完成后的卡通形象草图为委托创作作品。再审申请人主张草图系法人作品或特殊职务作品但无证据材料证明受托人系代表单位意志进行创作或为完成工作任务创作的，没有事实和法律依据，人民法院不予支持其再审申请。
[Judgment Abstract]
If a party is commissioned by others to create cartoon images in a cartoon movie, the cartoon sketching completed independently by such party is a commissioned work. Where the petitioner in the retrial court asserts that the sketching is a work of legal entity or a special service work, but provides no evidence that the commissioned party creates the work on behalf of the entity or in order to fulfill the job duties and responsibilities, the people's court may not support such retrial petition as the claim statements lack factual and legal grounds.
二、中国音像著作权集体管理协会与台儿庄区神话会所 KTV 娱乐店侵害作品放映权纠纷上诉案
China Audio-Video Copyright Association v. Shenhua KTV Entertainment Club, Tai'erzhuang District (appeal case regarding dispute over infringement of projection right)
【裁判摘要】
侵权人未经著作权人许可，以营利为目的，在其经营的娱乐场所向消费者播放被诉侵权音乐作品，构成对著作权人放映权的侵犯，依法应承担赔偿责任。著作权人以侵权人未向其支付作品的许可使用费为由提起诉讼，人民法院不能适用法定赔偿，应当以许可使用费认定为权利人的实际损失。
[Judgment Abstract]
Where an infringer plays copyrighted musical works for profit-making purposes in its commercial entertainment venue without the copyright holder's authorization, such act constitutes an infringement of the copyright holder's right of projection, thereby rendering the infringer liable for damages in accordance with law. Where the copyright holder files a lawsuit on the grounds that the infringer has failed to pay royalties for the works, the people's court may not award statutory damages and should instead determine the actual damages based on the unpaid royalties.
三、北京龙威互动科技有限公司与上海可那信息科技有限公司侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷上诉案
Beijing Longwei Interactive Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Kena Information Technology Co., Ltd. (appellate case regarding dispute over computer software copyright infringement)
【裁判摘要】
计算机软件著作权侵权纠纷中，被诉侵权人通过网络平台对不特定公众提供计算机软件，其侵权行为的实施及损害结果均直接发生在网络环境下的，其侵害软件著作权的行为属于信息网络侵权，该侵权行为的侵权结果发生地包含被侵权人住所地。软件著作权人作为被侵权人，其住所地法院对案件享有管辖权。
[Judgment Abstract]
In a dispute over computer software copyright infringement, where the alleged infringer provides computer software to unspecified public through online platforms, and both the infringing acts and corresponding consequences occur directly in cyberspace, such infringement constitutes an information network infringement, and the place where the infringement consequences occur covers the place of domicile of the infringed. Given that the software copyright owner is the infringed, the court at the place of domicile thereof has jurisdiction over the case.
