原创 Mani 北大法宝 2025年09月18日 17:35 北京
⊙本文长约6000字，阅读需时16分钟
北大法宝推出“法宝双语案例”栏目。本栏目选取近期热门司法案例进行双语发布，每两周一期，欢迎关注！感谢新老朋友对北大法宝的大力支持，我们会持续为大家提供更好的法律信息服务。本周推送第一百五十六期，主要关注涉第三人撤销之诉纠纷案例！
本期双语案例推送天津鑫泽盛航材贸易有限公司、山西普大煤业集团有限公司等第三人撤销之诉上诉案等涉第三人撤销之诉纠纷案例。
目录
Contents
1. 天津鑫泽盛航材贸易有限公司、山西普大煤业集团有限公司等第三人撤销之诉上诉案
Tianjin Xinzesheng Aviation Materials Trading Co., Ltd. v. Shanxi Puda Coal Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. (appeal case regarding a third-party revocation action)
2. 毕珊珊与于传河第三人撤销之诉纠纷上诉案
Bi Shanshan v. Yu Chuanhe (appeal case regarding dispute over a third-party revocation action)
3. 广西中小企业融资担保有限公司与南宁市金通小额贷款有限公司第三人撤销之诉纠纷上诉案
Guangxi Small & Medium-Sized Enterprise Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd. v. Nanning Jintong Small Loan Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over a third-party revocation action)
一、天津鑫泽盛航材贸易有限公司、山西普大煤业集团有限公司等第三人撤销之诉上诉案
Tianjin Xinzesheng Aviation Materials Trading Co., Ltd. v. Shanxi Puda Coal Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. (appeal case regarding a third-party revocation action)
【裁判摘要】
有独立请求权或无独立请求权的第三人因不可归责于本人的原因未参加诉讼，发生法律效力的判决、裁定、调解书损害其民事权益的，其可以在知道或应当知道权益受到损害之日起六个月内，提起第三人撤销之诉。实践中，当事人提供的证据不能证明调解书存在全部或者部分内容错误，且其提起第三人撤销之诉已超过法律规定的六个月期间，因此，当事人提起的诉讼不符合第三人撤销之诉的法定条件。
[Judgment Abstract]
If any third party having or not having an independent claim fails to participate in the action for reasons not attributable to itself, and any effective judgment, ruling or mediation infringes upon its civil rights and interests, the third party is entitled to file a third-party revocation action within six months from the date when it knows or should have known the infringement. In judicial practice, where the evidence provided by a party is not able to prove that the mediation is entirely or partially erroneous, and the party files a third-party revocation action after the lapse of the six-month prescribed period, then the action filed by the said party doesn't meet the statutory conditions for third-party revocation actions.
二、毕珊珊与于传河第三人撤销之诉纠纷上诉案
Bi Shanshan v. Yu Chuanhe (appeal case regarding dispute over a third-party revocation action)
【裁判摘要】
案外人就执行异议之诉与第三人撤销之诉，只能选择其中一种救济程序，救济程序启动后案外人不享有程序选择权。因此，案外人选择提起执行异议，其对执行异议裁定不服并认为原裁判内容错误损害其合法权益的，只能向作出原裁判的人民法院申请再审，其提起第三人撤销之诉的，人民法院不予受理。
[Judgment Abstract]
A nonparty may only choose one from two relief procedures, either an action for enforcement objection or an action for revocation by a third party. Once one relief procedure is initiated, the nonparty may not enjoy the right to choose an alternative procedure. Therefore, where a nonparty has chosen to file an enforcement objection action, in which he or she is not satisfied with the ruling on the enforcement objection arguing that the original adjudication shows content errors and infringes upon his or her legitimate rights and interests, the nonparty may only apply for retrial of the case with the people's court making the original adjudication. Accordingly, any third-party revocation action initiated by the nonparty shall not be accepted by the people's court.
三、广西中小企业融资担保有限公司与南宁市金通小额贷款有限公司第三人撤销之诉纠纷上诉案
Guangxi Small & Medium-Sized Enterprise Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd. v. Nanning Jintong Small Loan Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over a third-party revocation action)
【裁判摘要】
提起撤销之诉的第三人原则上限于有独立请求权或者无独立请求权的第三人，一般不包括普通债权人。实践中，当事人享有的债权仅是普通反担保债权，且人民法院判决结果与其并无法律上的利害关系，因此，其不具有提起第三人撤销之诉的请求权。
[Judgment Abstract]
The right to bring revocation actions is strictly limited to third parties having or not having an independent claim, a category that generally excludes ordinary creditors. In legal practice, whereas the party holds only a general counter-guarantee claim and doesn't have a legal stake in the judgment of the people's court, the party doesn't have the right to initiate a third-party revocation action.
